HaGefen
Spotlight
In
its 17th Middle East Program since 2002, the Social Action Committee
brought back Shula Gilad of the Israel-Palestinian Negotiating Partners
(IPNP). IPNP is a program of the Mercy Corps Conflict Management Group
that is affiliated with Harvard. IPNP's brings together Israelis and
Palestinians to learn negotiation skills.
Some
65 people squeezed into the Hebrew Center's Social Hall on Sunday, November
1, for an intense two hours. The presenters were:
Modeling
civil discourse among themselves, the panelists talked about ways that
the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians might be approached below
the "top of the pyramid" of senior officials through conflict
management techniques and through the development of young and mid-level
professionals on both sides-many of whom already know one another. These
relationships take place against the backdrop of polls showing that
70% of Israelis and Palestinians say they want peace-but they see only
25% of their own people and 25% of the other side wanting peace.
Mr.
Khazmo presented maps and statistics showing the increase in Israeli
settlement activity in the West Bank and around Jerusalem, the path
of the security fence into the West Bank, and the fragmentation of the
West Bank by checkpoints and roadblocks. The result is a crippling of
the Palestinian economy and less land available for a future independent
Palestinian state. Mr. Farsakh emphasized that the asymmetry in power
between the Palestinians and Israelis limits Palestinian options. "We
are not against Israel," he concluded, "We are against Israeli
policy."
Mr.
Saltzman referred to the European Union as the most important economic
force in Israel, which gives the EU some leverage in pressing for a
solution to the conflict. He described the rapid development of the
Young Israeli Forum for Cooperation (YIFC), which is preparing young
professionals to advise their respective leaders and to take over leadership
positions in government, business and non-governmental organizations.
In
a lengthy question and answer session, the highly engaged audience raised
a variety of questions from different perspectives.